Search Results for: Brief cases
wrong," root v. railway co., u. s. , , and the coun- tervailing equitable principle that the wrongdoer should not be pun- ished by "pay[ing] more than a fair compensation to the person wronged," tilghman v. proctor, u. s. , – . the remedy has been a mainstay of equity courts, and is not limited to cases
(b) petitioners briefly claim that their disgorgement award crosses the bounds of traditional equity practice by failing to return funds to victims, imposing joint-and-several liability, and declining to deduct business expenses from the award. because the parties did not fully brief these narrower questions...
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1501_8n5a.pdf